63XP
RisingGroundwater
Civic arena matchup
Squamish vs Toronto
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Squamish vs Toronto — City Score 2025
Squamish: 63% (#18 of 343). Toronto: 69% (#6 of 343). Pillar wins: Squamish 1, Toronto 5.
| Pillar | Squamish | Toronto |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 63% (#18 of 5) | 69% (#6 of 7) |
| Drinking water | 139 mg/L (#215 of 343) | 121 mg/L (#258 of 343) |
| Building permits | No data | $11.4B (#1 of 25) |
| Internet | 308 Mbps (seed tier) (#213 of 343) | 950 Mbps (seed tier) (#75 of 343) |
| Radon | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) | 60 Bq/m³ (#200 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | 7.46 mills (#53 of 57) |
Matchup verdict · Toronto on the board
Squamish1vs5Toronto
Toronto takes the night 5–1 on scored pillars. Squamish still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 63% vs 69%Arena rank #18 vs #6
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Squamish left, Toronto right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Squamish
63%63%#18 of 5
−6 XP
TorontoEdge
69%69%#6 of 7
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
Squamish
139 mg/L63%#215 of 343
−12 XP
TorontoEdge
121 mg/L75%#258 of 343
Building permits
Squamish
No data—
—
TorontoEdge
$11.4B100%#1 of 25
Internet
ISED National Broadband Data — advertised availability tier
Squamish
308 Mbps (seed tier)38%#213 of 343
−40 XP
TorontoEdge
950 Mbps (seed tier)78%#75 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
+15 XP
Toronto
60 Bq/m³84%#200 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Squamish
No data—
—
Toronto
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Squamish
No data—
—
TorontoEdge
7.46 mills93%#53 of 57
Final tally · category wins
Squamish
1
Categories won
—
Toronto
5
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Squamish city page · Toronto city page