65XP
DirectSurface
Civic arena matchup
Alma vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Alma vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Alma: 65% (#16 of 343). Squamish: 67% (#10 of 343). Pillar wins: Alma 2, Squamish 3.
| Pillar | Alma | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 65% (#16 of 6) | 67% (#10 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 168 mg/L (#188 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) |
| Building permits | $846M (#33 of 343) | $637M (#106 of 343) |
| Internet | 988 Mbps (seed tier) (#12 of 343) | 727 Mbps (seed tier) (#108 of 343) |
| Radon | 96 Bq/m³ (#130 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
#16
VS
67XP
♛Top 10RisingDirect+1 earned
Matchup verdict · Squamish on the board
Alma2vs3Squamish
Squamish takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Alma still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 65% vs 67%Arena rank #16 vs #10
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Alma left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Alma
65%65%#16 of 6
−2 XP
SquamishEdge
67%67%#10 of 6
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
Alma
168 mg/L55%#188 of 343
−13 XP
SquamishEdge
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
Building permits
AlmaEdge
$846M91%#33 of 343
+22 XP
Squamish
$637M69%#106 of 343
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
AlmaEdge
988 Mbps (seed tier)97%#12 of 343
+28 XP
Squamish
727 Mbps (seed tier)69%#108 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Alma
96 Bq/m³55%#130 of 238
−44 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Alma
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Alma
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Alma
2
Categories won
—
Squamish
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Alma city page · Squamish city page