Civic arena matchup
Squamish vs Whitchurch-Stouffville
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Squamish vs Whitchurch-Stouffville — City Score 2025
Squamish: 67% (#10 of 343). Whitchurch-Stouffville: 68% (#7 of 343). Pillar wins: Squamish 1, Whitchurch-Stouffville 4.
| Pillar | Squamish | Whitchurch-Stouffville |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 67% (#10 of 6) | 68% (#7 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) | 101 mg/L (#308 of 343) |
| Building permits | $637M (#106 of 343) | $805M (#45 of 343) |
| Internet | 727 Mbps (seed tier) (#108 of 343) | 755 Mbps (seed tier) (#96 of 343) |
| Radon | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) | 60 Bq/m³ (#202 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
Full City Score table · Permalink · Squamish · Whitchurch-Stouffville
Matchup verdict · Whitchurch-Stouffville on the board
Whitchurch-Stouffville takes the night 4–1 on scored pillars. Squamish still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Squamish left, Whitchurch-Stouffville right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
Building permits
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Final tally · category wins
Squamish
1
Categories won
Whitchurch-Stouffville
4
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Squamish city page · Whitchurch-Stouffville city page