66XP
RisingDirectGroundwater
Civic arena matchup
Squamish vs Taber
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Squamish vs Taber — City Score 2025
Squamish: 66% (#18 of 343). Taber: 66% (#14 of 343). Pillar wins: Squamish 2, Taber 3.
| Pillar | Squamish | Taber |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 66% (#18 of 6) | 66% (#14 of 4) |
| Drinking water | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) | 148 mg/L (#219 of 343) |
| Building permits | $637M (#106 of 343) | $905M (#23 of 343) |
| Internet | 846 Mbps (seed tier) (#219 of 343) | 1000 Mbps (seed tier) (#28 of 343) |
| Radon | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) | No data |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
Matchup verdict · Taber on the board
Squamish2vs3Taber
Taber takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Squamish still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 66% vs 66%Arena rank #18 vs #14
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Squamish left, Taber right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Squamish
66%66%#18 of 6
Even
TaberEdge
66%66%#14 of 4
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
SquamishEdge
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
+4 XP
Taber
148 mg/L64%#219 of 343
Building permits
Squamish
$637M69%#106 of 343
−25 XP
TaberEdge
$905M94%#23 of 343
Internet
ISED National Broadband Data — advertised availability tier
Squamish
846 Mbps (seed tier)36%#219 of 343
−56 XP
TaberEdge
1000 Mbps (seed tier)92%#28 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
—
Taber
No data—
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Squamish
No data—
—
Taber
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Squamish
No data—
—
Taber
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Squamish
2
Categories won
—
Taber
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Squamish city page · Taber city page