64XP
DirectSurface
Civic arena matchup
Ponoka vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Ponoka vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Ponoka: 64% (#18 of 343). Squamish: 70% (#6 of 343). Pillar wins: Ponoka 2, Squamish 3.
| Pillar | Ponoka | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 64% (#18 of 5) | 70% (#6 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 88 mg/L (#327 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) |
| Building permits | $785M (#55 of 343) | $637M (#106 of 343) |
| Internet | 675 Mbps (seed tier) (#130 of 343) | 727 Mbps (seed tier) (#108 of 343) |
| Radon | 114 Bq/m³ (#100 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
#18
VS
70XP
♛Top 6RisingDirect+1 earned
Matchup verdict · Squamish on the board
Ponoka2vs3Squamish
Squamish takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Ponoka still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 64% vs 70%Arena rank #18 vs #6
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Ponoka left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Ponoka
64%64%#18 of 5
−6 XP
SquamishEdge
70%70%#6 of 6
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
PonokaEdge
88 mg/L95%#327 of 343
+27 XP
Squamish
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
Building permits
PonokaEdge
$785M84%#55 of 343
+15 XP
Squamish
$637M69%#106 of 343
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
Ponoka
675 Mbps (seed tier)62%#130 of 343
−7 XP
SquamishEdge
727 Mbps (seed tier)69%#108 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Ponoka
114 Bq/m³42%#100 of 238
−57 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Ponoka
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Ponoka
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Ponoka
2
Categories won
—
Squamish
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Ponoka city page · Squamish city page