70XP
Top 5RisingDirect+1 earned
Civic arena matchup
Ottawa vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Ottawa vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Ottawa: 70% (#5 of 343). Squamish: 67% (#10 of 343). Pillar wins: Ottawa 3, Squamish 3.
| Pillar | Ottawa | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 70% (#5 of 7) | 67% (#10 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 112 mg/L (#285 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) |
| Building permits | $459M (#179 of 343) | $637M (#106 of 343) |
| Internet | 599 Mbps (seed tier) (#163 of 343) | 727 Mbps (seed tier) (#108 of 343) |
| Radon | 112 Bq/m³ (#113 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | 7.36 mills (#54 of 57) | No data |
#5
VSDead heat
67XP
Top 10RisingDirect+1 earned
Matchup verdict · Dead heat
Ottawa3vs3Squamish
Dead heat at 3–3. Neither city runs away on the pillar board — call it a draw until the next data refresh.
City Score XP: 70% vs 67%Arena rank #5 vs #10
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Ottawa left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
OttawaEdge
70%70%#5 of 7
+3 XP
Squamish
67%67%#10 of 6
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
OttawaEdge
112 mg/L83%#285 of 343
+15 XP
Squamish
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
Building permits
Ottawa
$459M48%#179 of 343
−21 XP
SquamishEdge
$637M69%#106 of 343
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
Ottawa
599 Mbps (seed tier)53%#163 of 343
−16 XP
SquamishEdge
727 Mbps (seed tier)69%#108 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Ottawa
112 Bq/m³47%#113 of 238
−52 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Ottawa
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
OttawaEdge
7.36 mills95%#54 of 57
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Ottawa
3
Categories won
—
Squamish
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Ottawa city page · Squamish city page