72XP
♛ChampionDirectSurface
Civic arena matchup
Ottawa vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Ottawa vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Ottawa: 72% (#1 of 343). Squamish: 63% (#18 of 343). Pillar wins: Ottawa 5, Squamish 1.
| Pillar | Ottawa | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 72% (#1 of 6) | 63% (#18 of 5) |
| Drinking water | 21 mg/L (#341 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#215 of 343) |
| Building permits | $2,061 (#7 of 10) | No data |
| Internet | 635 Mbps (seed tier) (#146 of 343) | 308 Mbps (seed tier) (#213 of 343) |
| Radon | 112 Bq/m³ (#113 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | 7.36 mills (#54 of 57) | No data |
#1
VS
63XP
RisingGroundwater
Matchup verdict · Ottawa on the board
Ottawa5vs1Squamish
Ottawa takes the night 5–1 on scored pillars. Squamish still leads where the raw readings say so — open each category below.
City Score XP: 72% vs 63%Arena rank #1 vs #18
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Ottawa left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
OttawaEdge
72%72%#1 of 6
+9 XP
Squamish
63%63%#18 of 5
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
OttawaEdge
21 mg/L99%#341 of 343
+36 XP
Squamish
139 mg/L63%#215 of 343
Building permits
OttawaEdge
$2,06140%#7 of 10
—
Squamish
No data—
Internet
ISED National Broadband Data — advertised availability tier
OttawaEdge
635 Mbps (seed tier)58%#146 of 343
+20 XP
Squamish
308 Mbps (seed tier)38%#213 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Ottawa
112 Bq/m³47%#113 of 238
−52 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Ottawa
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
OttawaEdge
7.36 mills95%#54 of 57
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Ottawa
5
Categories won
—
Squamish
1
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Ottawa city page · Squamish city page