67XP
♛Top 10RisingDirect+1 earned
Civic arena matchup
Neepawa vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Neepawa vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Neepawa: 67% (#10 of 343). Squamish: 70% (#6 of 343). Pillar wins: Neepawa 3, Squamish 2.
| Pillar | Neepawa | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 67% (#10 of 4) | 70% (#6 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 137 mg/L (#239 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) |
| Building permits | $871M (#31 of 343) | $637M (#106 of 343) |
| Internet | 791 Mbps (seed tier) (#82 of 343) | 727 Mbps (seed tier) (#108 of 343) |
| Radon | No data | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
#10
VS
70XP
Top 6RisingDirect+1 earned
Matchup verdict · Neepawa on the board
Neepawa3vs2Squamish
Neepawa takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Squamish still leads where the raw readings say so — open each category below.
City Score XP: 67% vs 70%Arena rank #10 vs #6
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Neepawa left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Neepawa
67%67%#10 of 4
−3 XP
SquamishEdge
70%70%#6 of 6
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
NeepawaEdge
137 mg/L70%#239 of 343
+2 XP
Squamish
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
Building permits
NeepawaEdge
$871M91%#31 of 343
+22 XP
Squamish
$637M69%#106 of 343
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
NeepawaEdge
791 Mbps (seed tier)76%#82 of 343
+7 XP
Squamish
727 Mbps (seed tier)69%#108 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Neepawa
No data—
—
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Neepawa
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Neepawa
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Neepawa
3
Categories won
—
Squamish
2
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Neepawa city page · Squamish city page