66XP
Direct
Civic arena matchup
Langford vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Langford vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Langford: 66% (#12 of 343). Squamish: 67% (#10 of 343). Pillar wins: Langford 2, Squamish 3.
| Pillar | Langford | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 66% (#12 of 6) | 67% (#10 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 91 mg/L (#320 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) |
| Building permits | $522M (#154 of 343) | $637M (#106 of 343) |
| Internet | 729 Mbps (seed tier) (#106 of 343) | 727 Mbps (seed tier) (#108 of 343) |
| Radon | 41 Bq/m³ (#218 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
#12
VS
67XP
♛Top 10RisingDirect+1 earned
Matchup verdict · Squamish on the board
Langford2vs3Squamish
Squamish takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Langford still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 66% vs 67%Arena rank #12 vs #10
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Langford left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Langford
66%66%#12 of 6
−1 XP
SquamishEdge
67%67%#10 of 6
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
LangfordEdge
91 mg/L93%#320 of 343
+25 XP
Squamish
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
Building permits
Langford
$522M55%#154 of 343
−14 XP
SquamishEdge
$637M69%#106 of 343
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
LangfordEdge
729 Mbps (seed tier)69%#106 of 343
Even
Squamish
727 Mbps (seed tier)69%#108 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Langford
41 Bq/m³92%#218 of 238
−7 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Langford
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Langford
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Langford
2
Categories won
—
Squamish
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Langford city page · Squamish city page