65XP
Groundwater
Civic arena matchup
Grimsby vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Grimsby vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Grimsby: 65% (#20 of 343). Squamish: 66% (#15 of 343). Pillar wins: Grimsby 2, Squamish 3.
| Pillar | Grimsby | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 65% (#20 of 6) | 66% (#15 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 169 mg/L (#183 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) |
| Building permits | $645M (#100 of 343) | $637M (#106 of 343) |
| Internet | 1000 Mbps (seed tier) (#36 of 343) | 308 Mbps (seed tier) (#213 of 343) |
| Radon | 85 Bq/m³ (#170 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
#20
VS
66XP
♛RisingGroundwater
Matchup verdict · Squamish on the board
Grimsby2vs3Squamish
Squamish takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Grimsby still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 65% vs 66%Arena rank #20 vs #15
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Grimsby left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Grimsby
65%65%#20 of 6
−1 XP
SquamishEdge
66%66%#15 of 6
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
Grimsby
169 mg/L53%#183 of 343
−15 XP
SquamishEdge
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
Building permits
GrimsbyEdge
$645M71%#100 of 343
+2 XP
Squamish
$637M69%#106 of 343
Internet
ISED National Broadband Data — advertised availability tier
GrimsbyEdge
1000 Mbps (seed tier)90%#36 of 343
+52 XP
Squamish
308 Mbps (seed tier)38%#213 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Grimsby
85 Bq/m³71%#170 of 238
−28 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Grimsby
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Grimsby
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Grimsby
2
Categories won
—
Squamish
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Grimsby city page · Squamish city page