64XP
♛Surface
Civic arena matchup
Fort Erie vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Fort Erie vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Fort Erie: 64% (#15 of 343). Squamish: 63% (#18 of 343). Pillar wins: Fort Erie 3, Squamish 1.
| Pillar | Fort Erie | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 64% (#15 of 5) | 63% (#18 of 5) |
| Drinking water | 135 mg/L (#222 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#215 of 343) |
| Building permits | No data | No data |
| Internet | 1000 Mbps (seed tier) (#35 of 343) | 308 Mbps (seed tier) (#213 of 343) |
| Radon | 57 Bq/m³ (#203 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
#15
VS
63XP
RisingGroundwater
Matchup verdict · Fort Erie on the board
Fort Erie3vs1Squamish
Fort Erie takes the night 3–1 on scored pillars. Squamish still leads where the raw readings say so — open each category below.
City Score XP: 64% vs 63%Arena rank #15 vs #18
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Fort Erie left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Fort ErieEdge
64%64%#15 of 5
+1 XP
Squamish
63%63%#18 of 5
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
Fort ErieEdge
135 mg/L65%#222 of 343
+2 XP
Squamish
139 mg/L63%#215 of 343
Building permits
Fort Erie
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Internet
ISED National Broadband Data — advertised availability tier
Fort ErieEdge
1000 Mbps (seed tier)90%#35 of 343
+52 XP
Squamish
308 Mbps (seed tier)38%#213 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Fort Erie
57 Bq/m³85%#203 of 238
−14 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Fort Erie
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Fort Erie
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Fort Erie
3
Categories won
—
Squamish
1
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Fort Erie city page · Squamish city page