60XP
DroppingDirectSurface
Civic arena matchup
Coquitlam vs Parksville
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Coquitlam vs Parksville — City Score 2025
Coquitlam: 60% (#46 of 343). Parksville: 60% (#37 of 343). Pillar wins: Coquitlam 1, Parksville 3.
| Pillar | Coquitlam | Parksville |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 60% (#46 of 5) | 60% (#37 of 5) |
| Drinking water | 22 mg/L (#336 of 343) | 83 mg/L (#325 of 343) |
| Building permits | No data | No data |
| Internet | 361 Mbps (seed tier) (#203 of 343) | 387 Mbps (seed tier) (#196 of 343) |
| Radon | 35 Bq/m³ (#223 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#229 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
Matchup verdict · Parksville on the board
Coquitlam1vs3Parksville
Parksville takes the night 3–1 on scored pillars. Coquitlam still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 60% vs 60%Arena rank #46 vs #37
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Coquitlam left, Parksville right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Coquitlam
60%60%#46 of 5
Even
ParksvilleEdge
60%60%#37 of 5
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
CoquitlamEdge
22 mg/L98%#336 of 343
+3 XP
Parksville
83 mg/L95%#325 of 343
Building permits
Coquitlam
No data—
—
Parksville
No data—
Internet
ISED National Broadband Data — advertised availability tier
Coquitlam
361 Mbps (seed tier)41%#203 of 343
−2 XP
ParksvilleEdge
387 Mbps (seed tier)43%#196 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Coquitlam
35 Bq/m³94%#223 of 238
−2 XP
ParksvilleEdge
35 Bq/m³96%#229 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Coquitlam
No data—
—
Parksville
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Coquitlam
No data—
—
Parksville
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Coquitlam
1
Categories won
—
Parksville
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Coquitlam city page · Parksville city page