64XP
DirectGroundwater
Civic arena matchup
Colwood vs Squamish
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Colwood vs Squamish — City Score 2025
Colwood: 64% (#17 of 343). Squamish: 70% (#6 of 343). Pillar wins: Colwood 2, Squamish 3.
| Pillar | Colwood | Squamish |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 64% (#17 of 6) | 70% (#6 of 6) |
| Drinking water | 103 mg/L (#301 of 343) | 139 mg/L (#234 of 343) |
| Building permits | $669M (#91 of 343) | $637M (#106 of 343) |
| Internet | 341 Mbps (seed tier) (#251 of 343) | 727 Mbps (seed tier) (#108 of 343) |
| Radon | 41 Bq/m³ (#216 of 238) | 35 Bq/m³ (#236 of 238) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
#17
VS
70XP
♛Top 6RisingDirect+1 earned
Matchup verdict · Squamish on the board
Colwood2vs3Squamish
Squamish takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Colwood still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 64% vs 70%Arena rank #17 vs #6
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Colwood left, Squamish right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Colwood
64%64%#17 of 6
−6 XP
SquamishEdge
70%70%#6 of 6
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
ColwoodEdge
103 mg/L88%#301 of 343
+20 XP
Squamish
139 mg/L68%#234 of 343
Building permits
ColwoodEdge
$669M74%#91 of 343
+5 XP
Squamish
$637M69%#106 of 343
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
Colwood
341 Mbps (seed tier)27%#251 of 343
−42 XP
SquamishEdge
727 Mbps (seed tier)69%#108 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Colwood
41 Bq/m³91%#216 of 238
−8 XP
SquamishEdge
35 Bq/m³99%#236 of 238
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Colwood
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Colwood
No data—
—
Squamish
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Colwood
2
Categories won
—
Squamish
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Colwood city page · Squamish city page