62XP
DroppingDirectSurface
Civic arena matchup
Coquitlam vs Kimberley
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Coquitlam vs Kimberley — City Score 2025
Coquitlam: 62% (#29 of 343). Kimberley: 63% (#26 of 343). Pillar wins: Coquitlam 2, Kimberley 3.
| Pillar | Coquitlam | Kimberley |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 62% (#29 of 6) | 63% (#26 of 5) |
| Drinking water | 169 mg/L (#182 of 343) | 102 mg/L (#305 of 343) |
| Building permits | $452M (#183 of 343) | $610M (#120 of 343) |
| Internet | 1000 Mbps (seed tier) (#37 of 343) | 1000 Mbps (seed tier) (#42 of 343) |
| Radon | 35 Bq/m³ (#223 of 238) | No data |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | No data | No data |
Matchup verdict · Kimberley on the board
Coquitlam2vs3Kimberley
Kimberley takes the night 3–2 on scored pillars. Coquitlam still wins individual categories — the scoreboard tells the fuller story.
City Score XP: 62% vs 63%Arena rank #29 vs #26
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Coquitlam left, Kimberley right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Coquitlam
62%62%#29 of 6
−1 XP
KimberleyEdge
63%63%#26 of 5
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
Coquitlam
169 mg/L53%#182 of 343
−36 XP
KimberleyEdge
102 mg/L89%#305 of 343
Building permits
Coquitlam
$452M47%#183 of 343
−18 XP
KimberleyEdge
$610M65%#120 of 343
Internet
ISED National Broadband Data — advertised availability tier
CoquitlamEdge
1000 Mbps (seed tier)90%#37 of 343
+2 XP
Kimberley
1000 Mbps (seed tier)88%#42 of 343
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
CoquitlamEdge
35 Bq/m³94%#223 of 238
—
Kimberley
No data—
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Coquitlam
No data—
—
Kimberley
No data—
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Coquitlam
No data—
—
Kimberley
No data—
Final tally · category wins
Coquitlam
2
Categories won
—
Kimberley
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Coquitlam city page · Kimberley city page