Civic arena matchup
Neepawa vs Whitchurch-Stouffville
City Score 2025 head-to-head across seven pillars. National ranks of 343 places. Challenger A is teal, challenger B is navy — missing readings stay blank.
Neepawa vs Whitchurch-Stouffville — City Score 2025
Neepawa: 65% (#19 of 343). Whitchurch-Stouffville: 68% (#11 of 343). Pillar wins: Neepawa 3, Whitchurch-Stouffville 3.
| Pillar | Neepawa | Whitchurch-Stouffville |
|---|---|---|
| City Score | 65% (#19 of 7) | 68% (#11 of 7) |
| Drinking water | 137 mg/L (#239 of 343) | 101 mg/L (#308 of 343) |
| Building permits | $871M (#31 of 343) | $805M (#45 of 343) |
| Internet | 582 Mbps (seed tier) (#82 of 343) | 555 Mbps (seed tier) (#96 of 343) |
| Radon | 137 Bq/m³ (#202 of 343) | 101 Bq/m³ (#247 of 343) |
| Hazards | No data | No data |
| Property tax | 8.86 mills (#232 of 343) | 10.13 mills (#163 of 343) |
Full City Score table · Permalink · Neepawa · Whitchurch-Stouffville
Matchup verdict · Dead heat
Dead heat at 3–3. Neither city runs away on the pillar board — call it a draw until the next data refresh.
Pillar duel boards
Metric-by-metric face-off
One row per pillar — Neepawa left, Whitchurch-Stouffville right, delta in the middle. Bars mirror toward centre.
City Score
Drinking water
Lower hardness rank wins on standing
Building permits
Internet
ISED seed tier — not per-address speed
Radon
Lower indoor radon wins
Hazards
Lower seismic PGA wins
Property tax
Lower mill rate wins
Final tally · category wins
Neepawa
3
Categories won
Whitchurch-Stouffville
3
Categories won
Pick another matchup · City Score table · Neepawa city page · Whitchurch-Stouffville city page